University of Utah Police to Implement Body-Worn Cameras

The University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah, has announced that its campus police will now use body-worn cameras. According to a news release, the purpose of the body cameras is to “promote accountability; increase public trust; provide supportive documentation for complaints, investigations and prosecutions; and improve training opportunities.”

“We want to be transparent in all our dealings with the community on campus, and the body-worn cameras are going to be a major part of that,” said Jason Hinojosa, the University of Utah Police’s acting chief. “Whenever there is an interaction—such as a traffic stop, dealing with suspects or talking with a pedestrian in response to a crime—then a camera would be used.”

The university’s guidelines for use of the body cameras comply with the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) standards. The university is currently taking steps to get accredited by CALEA, and also by the International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators (IACLEA).

The use of body cameras has recently become industry standard for policework, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. The news release cites a study that when body cameras were introduced into the Rialto Police Department in California, use-of-force incidents dropped by 60%, and complaints against officers dropped by 88%.

An interim rule, R1-011A, offers guidelines for use of body cameras not covered by policy 3-234, which dictates standards for building access and fixed surveillance cameras. The interim rule went into effect on July 16. “A new rule was required because the body-worn cameras can record audio, which is specifically not permitted under policy 3-234,” said professor Leslie Francis, Surveillance System Administrator Committee member. “Additionally, these new cameras will be used for law enforcement purposes and are except from Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) laws.”

Acting Chief Hinojosa also addressed issues of privacy and data security. All footage is stored on the website, and officers can only watch their own videos. The software does not allow them to edit or delete footage. Footage may only be shared if requested through the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) and approved by the university’s Office of General Council.

“We want to clarify that officers will not be recording citizen contacts, such as special events or a community outreach activity,” said Hinojosa. “Body-worn cameras will be utilized primarily to document incident responses, and recordings will be stored in a secured, cloud-based system. Only the officer who recorded the footage and their supervisors will be able to view the recordings, and a record of all viewings will be kept.”

Further information about the university’s body-worn camera policies, as well as a list of Frequently Asked Questions, is available on the University of Utah website.

About the Author

Matt Jones is senior editor of Spaces4Learning and Campus Security and Life Safety. He can be reached at


  • Convergint Gives Back Globally, Celebrates 23rd Annual Social Responsibility Day

    Today, Convergint celebrates its 23rd Annual Convergint Social Responsibility Day, as nearly 10,000 colleagues across 220 global locations have the opportunity to spend the workday giving back to their local communities. This year’s efforts have resulted in a total payroll donation of more than $3 million and more than $500,000 in labor and equipment donations from Convergint colleagues, partners, and families. Additionally, 400 colleagues and partners will help complete the company’s largest STEP Up project to-date for the Douglas County School District in Castle Rock, Colorado. Read Now

  • 2024 Secure Campus Award Winners Announced

    Campus Security Today is pleased to announce the 2024 Secure Campus Award winners. Twenty-six companies are being recognized this year for products that help keep education and business campuses safe. Read Now

  • Making Safety and Security Intrinsic to School Design

    Public anxieties about school safety are escalating across the country. According to a 2023 Gallup report, 44% of parents fear for their child’s physical safety at school, a 10 percentage-point increase since 2019. Unfortunately, these fears are likely to increase if the incidence of school tragedies continues to mount. As a result, school leaders are now charged with two non-negotiable responsibilities. The first, as always, is to ensure kids have what they need to learn, grow, and thrive. Sadly, their second responsibility is to keep the children in their care safe from threats and physical danger. Read Now

  • Unlocking Peace of Mind

    In a perfect world, every school would have an unlimited budget to help secure their schools. In reality, schools must prioritize what budget they have while navigating the complexities surrounding school security and lockdown Read Now