school camera

Activist Groups Launch Campaign to Pressure Universities to Ban Use of Facial Recognition

Fight for the Future and Students for Sensible Drug Policy are behind the effort to pressure college administrators to not use facial recognition software on their camera systems.

College students are partnering with anti-facial recognition activists to keep the technology from being used on university campuses, privacy advocacy group Fight for the Future announced on Tuesday.

Fight for the Future has paired up with Students for Sensible Drug Policy, which advocates for drug policy reforms, to fight against biometric surveillance on campuses. In coordination with the announcement, the two groups have launched a website and toolkit for student activists across the country to push against efforts to use facial recognition as part of campus security operations.

The effort includes a petition drive to ban non-personal use of facial recognition on campus, including at universities like George Washington University in Washington, D.C. and DePaul University in Chicago. About twelve university administrations, including Northwestern, Harvard and Stanford, have been contacted to clarify their policies on facial recognition.

“Schools that are already using this technology are conducting unethical experiments on their students,” said Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight for the Future, which conducted a similar campaign to pressure music festivals to ban facial recognition. “Students and staff have a right to know if their administrations are planning to implement biometric surveillance on campus.”

The announcement comes as cities and states have begun to reckon with the use of facial recognition in surveillance cameras used by police, landlords, retail stores and more. At least five cities, including three California cities and two Massachusetts towns, have banned police use of facial recognition. Last fall, the state of California adopted a measure that put a moratorium on police use for three years.

There has also been increasing scrutiny of how schools use facial recognition on students and protect student privacy. The Lockport School District in New York faced pushback over the past few months for its decision to implement facial recognition software, and more districts across the country are undergoing scrutiny by news outlets for how they adopt the technology as part of their quest to secure schools.

Fight for the Future noted that while there have been several reports of elementary and high schools testing facial recognition, it is not yet “widely used” at U.S. universities.

“Students have an obligation to prevent this technology going mainstream, beginning with university campuses, where we have the most power and we know how to win,” said Erika Darragh, a board member at Students for Sensible Drug Policy.

About the Author

Haley Samsel is an Associate Content Editor for the Infrastructure Solutions Group at 1105 Media.

Featured

  • Door Hardware and Campus Security: Enhancing Safety in Schools

    The importance of investing in school safety cannot be overstated, but knowing where to start implementation of school safety features can be a challenge. A recent survey by the National Center on Education Statistics found that a quarter of U.S. public schools have classrooms with doors that can't be locked from the inside. Even among schools with doors that do lock, recent legislation reflects a common misconception that simply keeping the doors locked all day will eliminate the potential for an attack, in direct violation of PASS (Partner Alliance for Safer Schools) Guidelines. Read Now

  • Brigham Young University Strengthens Campus Security With Genetec Operations Center

    Genetec Inc, a provider of enterprise physical security software, announced that Brigham Young University's (BYU) has optimized its security operations with the Genetec™ Operations Center work management system. Read Now

  • AI-based Risk Mitigation: The Next Advancement in Video Surveillance and Public Safety

    Safety is at the forefront of every organization and covers a gamut of scenarios, not just weapon-fueled lethal threats. It also includes smaller-scale and everyday situations like slipping hazards, fallen persons, unauthorized vehicles, and more. These issues cause disruptions in daily operations and cost companies and facilities money and downtime, so a fully realized security plan must involve actions that facility personnel should take once a hazard of any size occurs. Informing everyone that a hazard exists, where it’s located, and what actions to take is imperative for maintaining personal safety. Read Now

  • Fort Worth ISD Strengthens Event Safety

    The issue of concealed weapons being introduced into school extracurricular activities, including sporting events and graduations, became a growing concern in communities across the nation. According to the K-12 School Shooting Database, there were at least 202 incidents of gunfire on school grounds in 2024 across the United States, resulting in 56 deaths and 147 injuries, underscoring the urgent need for enhanced safety protocols. Read Now