Reducing Response Time

Reducing Response Time

Active shooter incidents on campus where you can play a vital role in gunshot detection

Some of the greatest challenges to campus security include the monitoring of multiple buildings and gathering areas, coupled with tracking the frequent comings and goings of students, staff and visitors through many open access points throughout the campus. When you add an active shooter incident into the mix, knowing exactly where the incident is happening in real time is critical, so first responders can rapidly mitigate the threat and building occupants can quickly get to safety.

Putting it into Practice

While this concept is well understood, putting it into practice is another story. If you are a member of campus police or a student on campus and you are in Building C and an active shooter starts firing in Building A, how do you know? When do you know? Who notifies 911 and how long does it take? How does that information get to you? Just as important, is it accurate?

In reaction to the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007, where an active shooter managed to go undetected for two and a half hours after his first two shots were fired in a dormitory and later shot 47 people he locked inside an academic hall (Panel, 2007), colleges and universities began implementing more robust mass notification systems.

Emergency kiosks, panic buttons, and “blue light boxes” became more widely deployed. These types of systems have greatly improved emergency communications on campuses, however they still require some form of human element to set them off, such as a student who presses the panic button or a security dispatcher who must compose and send the mass notification message.

With these systems in place, where does this leave 911? One of the earliest and most comprehensive studies on active shooter incidents was a 2012 Naval postgraduate school study which found that relying on 911 notification is an inadequate strategy to reduce response time in an active shooting incident, and that instead, a “Victim Initiated Mitigation System” is the most effective means of reducing casualties. The Department of Homeland Security adopted this model in their How to Respond active shooter booklets and what became the training commonly referred to as “Run, Hide, Fight.” These  and practices mean that you, an innocent bystander, could be law enforcement’s best option during those first few seconds of shooting, because they are still waiting for someone to call 911 before they even know to respond.

While 911 and mass notification systems remain viable, well established solutions for campuses, the addition of gunshot detection can supplement these systems by filling in critical missing gaps and improving the flow of information during an active shooter incident. The premise behind gunshot detection is that it will alert campus police faster than any current method. Providing vital location information, including where in the building the incident is happening, cuts through typical alert delays so more immediate response is initiated. To be most effective, the gunshot detection system will alert before the first 911 call and integrate with mass notification, video, public address systems and other alarms.

The real power in gunshot detection is leveraging integration that automates alerts to multiple parties simultaneously, including campus security, students, staff and visitors, so appropriate response actions can be immediately initiated.

A Military Approach to the Active Shooter

Before we dive into how gunshot detection technology works and how it applies to a campus setting, it is important to note the technology’s roots in history before it was developed for commercial applications. As a capability, gunshot detection first originated in a government initiative in 1995, and sponsored by a research arm of the Department of Defense called the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). DARPA sponsored the development of prototype systems that paired acoustic muzzle blast and ballistic shock wave signatures to predict the location of gunfire events and associated shooter locations. Six different systems were developed and tested, but it wasn’t until the Iraq War in 2003 that the need for these systems became critical.

U.S. troops were battling against an aggressive insurgency while traversing some of the roughest terrain on earth in noisy Humvees, and they often did not know they were being shot at until a fellow soldier was hit. Knowing they were being shot at, and being able to identify where the shots were coming from would give them a lifesaving and tactical advantage.

DARPA selected the company that had produced the most successful technology from their trials, BBN Technologies out of Cambridge, MA, and challenged them to rapidly develop vehicle gunshot detection systems that could not only localize a shooter to plus or minus 15-degree accuracy, but it also had to report within one second of a shot and do so on vehicles traveling up to 60 miles per hour on rough terrain and in harsh environments. That system was quickly deployed and is still in use today, credited with saving the lives of soldiers in military conflicts across the globe.

The Active Shooter Threat

In the 1990s and 2000s the United States witnessed a rising and disturbing trend of mass shooting incidents happening in schools, workplaces, movie theaters and other everyday environments. This created an influx of active shooter solutions to the market including ballistic glass, door locks and panic buttons. While they might be useful, these solutions still do not address the lack of critical information flow as a shooting incident unfolds – the what, when, how and where questions still need to be answered.

To address these problems, Shooter Detection Systems began adapting the military gunshot detection system, known as Boomerang, for indoor environments and brought these systems to the commercial market in 2014.

Today, gunshot detection technology is being used by higher education organizations including Georgia Tech, Savannah College of Art and Design and others, as well as on corporate, K-12 and government campuses.

Indoor Gunshot Detection Systems

In the process of educating yourself on what gunshot detection system is right for your campus, it is easy to get lost in technical and marketing jargon along the way. Before you get too far down the rabbit hole, remember the key questions: How do you know it is a gunshot? How is the information getting to you and others on campus? How long does that take? Is the information accurate?

At their core, all indoor gunshot detection systems are comprised of one or more sensors strategically positioned within facilities that transmit gunshot alerts through a communications platform. When evaluating sensor types, it is important to ask if the sensor will alert automatically or if it requires any machine learning or external validation. In other words, where is the shot processing taking place and how quickly does that happen? If the sensor does alert automatically, how does it filter out false alerts? If the sensor requires some kind of external or database verification, how long does that process take? How reliable is it? Asking these questions will help you understand the system’s rate of detection, detection accuracy, speed of alerting and how the sensor accomplishes these tasks.

Systems that rely on acoustics only can potentially produce false alerts due to loud noises in the environment. Systems that use AI or machine-learning are reliant on event comparison to a database or library of sounds in an attempt to filter out shot events from other sounds in the environment. Some systems send audio files to human analysts at a monitoring station to verify “possible” shot events or stream audio to the cloud. Audio clips sent outside of a local server may open organizations up to privacy concerns or violate privacy laws in hospitals and other settings.

Sensors that require manual calibration can be problematic in that they require close monitoring and analysis for a time before they are fine-tuned to sounds in the environment. Sensors that rely on any type of external validation will have delays in alerting speed and run the risk of producing false alerts.

Dual-mode or multi-mode sensors utilize acoustic detection plus additional detection technologies onboard the sensor. Shot information is generally processed at the sensor level, which requires no extra steps for the system to determine that a shot event has occurred. Dig deeper into these systems by asking what those additional modes are, and what conditions need to be met in order for the sensor to alert. Sensors that require both the signature of a gunshot (acoustic sensor) and the flash of a weapon (infrared sensor) to validate a shot will be most accurate in filtering out false alerts.

There is also power and networking to consider. Power-over-Ethernet (PoE) has advantages but has an impact on infrastructure, and DC power requirements could be problematic and subject to tampering. Wireless systems are the most flexible to install, however, end users should ask about sensor uptime and self-testing features and how they impact battery life, and if the communications system is secured with encryption.

Benefits and Best Practices

To put the benefit of reducing response time with gunshot detection into perspective, the average length of an active shooter incident is around five minutes (Investigation, 2013), with an average of one death occurring every 5 to 15 seconds (Taylor, 2017) while active shooting is taking place.

Ultimately, you need to be able to rely on your gunshot detection system to automate the alerting process as early as possible and from the incident occurring with the highest level of accuracy in order to justify the investment. Think back to the Virginia Tech shooting. After the dormitory shooting, the perpetrator fled the building undetected and returned hours later to complete his mission. Thirty-two people lost their lives when it was finally over. If gunshot detection technology were in place to detect the initial shot, the response may have been drastically different. Think how many lives could have been saved.

An additional benefit of gunshot detection that might get overlooked is the impact it can have on active shooter drills and training. More than 20 years of realistic active shooter drills being conducted in schools and other environments have shown us that these drills are potentially more traumatizing to students and staff than they are beneficial (Safety, 2020). Some gunshot detection systems have simulation and training modes that will activate the sequence of information flow, including integrated actions within video, mass notification, access control, etc., without needing to present a weapon into the environment. Similar to fire alarm drills, a simulated active shooter drill can help organizations initiate a calmer, more organized, less traumatic training experience.

For all the benefits gunshot detection can bring to a campus environment, the difficulty with system selection is that at this time there is no one governing body that regulates the industry or monitors marketing claims. An important resource any campus operator should look for is the Department of Homeland Security’s SAFETY Act program. Seek technologies that have been SAFETY Act Certified and bear the red Department of Homeland Security (DHS) seal of approval.

This indicates that the technology is listed on the DHS Approved Products List for Homeland Security and has been vetted by the DHS Science and Technology Directorate (S&T), a DHS arm that monitors emerging threats and encourages private industry to create technology solutions to abate them. On the other hand, a product bearing a green or blue mark will have only a Developmental Testing and Evaluation Designation (DT&E), indicating that the technology is still in the development and testing phase. Additional best practices include involving your security integrator early in the process and asking the manufacturer for customer references.

Gunshot detection becomes the starting point of response by immediately bringing situational awareness to the forefront, providing clarity over confusion. Gunshot detection will improve your overall security posture and strengthen your response to active shooter incidents and could potentially boost recruitment efforts for parents and students that place a high value on campus security in the selection process. Focus on finding a system that uses multiple modes of detection, has a high rate of detection accuracy, fast alerting speed, flexible integration capabilities, and devices that use secure communications and are safe to use on your network.

Equally important is a system that can be integrated seamlessly with your existing video and emergency notification systems, and one that enhances your active shooter training. This is where true automation happens and where gunshot detection can have the most impact on reducing the loss of life during active shooter incidents.

This article originally appeared in the May / June 2021 issue of Campus Security Today.


  • Convergint Gives Back Globally, Celebrates 23rd Annual Social Responsibility Day

    Today, Convergint celebrates its 23rd Annual Convergint Social Responsibility Day, as nearly 10,000 colleagues across 220 global locations have the opportunity to spend the workday giving back to their local communities. This year’s efforts have resulted in a total payroll donation of more than $3 million and more than $500,000 in labor and equipment donations from Convergint colleagues, partners, and families. Additionally, 400 colleagues and partners will help complete the company’s largest STEP Up project to-date for the Douglas County School District in Castle Rock, Colorado. Read Now

  • 2024 Secure Campus Award Winners Announced

    Campus Security Today is pleased to announce the 2024 Secure Campus Award winners. Twenty-six companies are being recognized this year for products that help keep education and business campuses safe. Read Now

  • Making Safety and Security Intrinsic to School Design

    Public anxieties about school safety are escalating across the country. According to a 2023 Gallup report, 44% of parents fear for their child’s physical safety at school, a 10 percentage-point increase since 2019. Unfortunately, these fears are likely to increase if the incidence of school tragedies continues to mount. As a result, school leaders are now charged with two non-negotiable responsibilities. The first, as always, is to ensure kids have what they need to learn, grow, and thrive. Sadly, their second responsibility is to keep the children in their care safe from threats and physical danger. Read Now

  • Unlocking Peace of Mind

    In a perfect world, every school would have an unlimited budget to help secure their schools. In reality, schools must prioritize what budget they have while navigating the complexities surrounding school security and lockdown Read Now