Northwestern Conducts External Review on Role of University Police

Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill., will consider restructuring the duties of the Department of Safety and Security, including the University Police, after receiving the results of an external review of the department.

Craig Johnson, Senior Vice President for Business and Finance at the university, sent an email this week announcing that the university is “rethinking Northwestern’s public safety practices” following the review, conversations with members of the community, and feedback from the Community Safety Advisory Board. According to the Daily Northwestern, two external reviewers held more than 80 conversations and focus groups with students, faculty, staff, campus law enforcement, and the administration. Groups consulted included NU Community Not Cops, Northwestern College Republicans, the deans of each graduate and undergraduate college, and more.

According to the report, “Both the community engagement and operational review found stakeholders broadly agree there is an urgent need for systemic change in campus safety practices. Many people of color, particularly Black students, feel pain and fear when seeing or interacting with a campus safety officer.”

Recommendations included in the report cover three broad themes:

  • “Rebuild trust through community engagement”
  • “Redirect resources towards more appropriate responses”
  • “Increase accountability and transparency of campus security”

More specifically, the report recommended measures like increasing interaction between officers and the community by placing police in small, visible spaces like residence halls to promote informal, friendly engagement. It also recommended that the Safety and Security Code of Conduct and Ethics be revised to include watching officers’ social media use and engagement with “extremist language and hate groups.”

Johnson’s email also stated that the University has committed to completing four tasks by June: again, according to the Daily Northwestern, “reconsidering DSS’s role in student mental health response, reviewing DSS’s current services and whether it should be performing them, rerouting complaints about safety services to outside DSS, and revising the use of racial identifiers in campus crime alerts.”

About the Author

Matt Jones is senior editor of Spaces4Learning and Campus Security and Life Safety. He can be reached at [email protected]

Featured

  • 2025 Secure Campus Award Winners Announced

    Campus Security Today is pleased to announce the 2025 Secure Campus Award winners. Twenty companies are being recognized this year for products that help keep education and business campuses safe. Read Now

  • K-12 School Safety Trends Report Shows Training, Technology Are Saving Lives

    CENTEGIX, the industry leader and most widely adopted wearable safety technology provider for K-12 education, today released its 2025 School Safety Trends Report, the only comprehensive and data-rich analysis of school safety available in the wearable panic button market. The report identifies and outlines the top tech and legislative movements relevant to school safety in the U.S. and draws on data collected in the 2024/2025 school year through the CENTEGIX Safety Platform, including more than 265,000 incidents of CrisisAlert use. Read Now

  • Survey: Fewer Than 20 Percent of School Leaders Consider Their Main Entrance “Completely Secure”

    Singlewire Software, provider of solutions that help keep people safe and informed, releases the findings of its inaugural School Entrance Security Report, which captured responses from more than 500 school staff members across the United States. This research highlights the concerns and challenges schools are facing in securing their entrances and keeping students and staff safe from potential threats Read Now

  • Securing Higher Education: Combating Enrollment Fraud and Empowering Student Financial Success

    Higher education institutions are facing a costly and growing crisis: enrollment fraud. Between 2020 and 2022, the cost[1] of acquiring a new student surged by up to 32%, straining already tight budgets. At the same time, “ghost students” using stolen identities to enroll fraudulently put institutions at even greater financial risk. Read Now