ucla sign

UCLA Abandons Plans To Use Facial Recognition On Campus After Students Voice Concerns

The university publicly disclosed that it was considering adding facial recognition software to its security operations, but backed away from the proposal after students and faculty voiced their opposition.

  • By Haley Samsel
  • March 02, 2020

Following sustained protests from students, the University of California, Los Angeles announced that it would drop its plans to use facial recognition software as part of its campus security strategy.

The technology had originally been proposed last year, with students having the opportunity to comment on the policy in June. Many voiced concerns, and thanks to a campaign by digital rights organization Fight for the Future, those concerns were elevated through protests and social media campaigns.

In response, UCLA administrators told Fight for the Future last month that they would no longer pursue the use of facial recognition on campus.

“We have determined that the potential benefits are limited and are vastly outweighed by the concerns of the campus community,” Michael Beck, a vice chancellor at the school, told Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight for the Future, in an email.

In a statement, student activist Matthew William Richard said that he was excited to see that UCLA listened to its students, workers, faculty and community by deciding to abandon its plans.

“We hope other universities see that they will not get away with these policies,” Richard, a third-year student at UCLA, said. “We hope UCLA continues their progress by specifically codifying this prohibition of software and creating infrastructure to legitimize our voices going forward; together we can demilitarize and democratize our campuses.”

Prior to UCLA’s announcement, Fight for the Future had contacted administrators about the results of an experiment its researchers had done to show the potential issues with using facial recognition for campus security purposes. Using Amazon’s Rekognition software, the organization ran 400 photos of UCLA’s football and basketball teams along with faculty members through a mugshot database.

Of those images, 58 photos of student-athletes or faculty members were falsely matched with mugshots in the database. Most of those images featured people of color, showing the potential accuracy issues that the university would have faced had it adopted facial recognition.

“I’m glad the administration listened to the community and is abandoning this plan,” Kimberlé Crenshaw, a UCLA law professor who developed the academic definition of intersectionality and was incorrectly matched with a mugshot photo, said in a statement. “Other school administrators should follow suit. Racially biased surveillance does not make our communities safer.”

Fight for the Future keeps a scorecard of universities that have publicly disclosed their policies on facial recognition, but many have not responded. This means that many universities could be using the technology already but are not coming forward about their policies.

“There are really no laws in place that would require private institutions, for example, to even disclose to their students that they’re doing this,” Greer told Inside Higher Ed. “We really do need policies in place so that it’s not up to school administrators.”

About the Author

Haley Samsel is an Associate Content Editor for the Infrastructure Solutions Group at 1105 Media.

Featured

  • Door Hardware and Campus Security: Enhancing Safety in Schools

    The importance of investing in school safety cannot be overstated, but knowing where to start implementation of school safety features can be a challenge. A recent survey by the National Center on Education Statistics found that a quarter of U.S. public schools have classrooms with doors that can't be locked from the inside. Even among schools with doors that do lock, recent legislation reflects a common misconception that simply keeping the doors locked all day will eliminate the potential for an attack, in direct violation of PASS (Partner Alliance for Safer Schools) Guidelines. Read Now

  • Brigham Young University Strengthens Campus Security With Genetec Operations Center

    Genetec Inc, a provider of enterprise physical security software, announced that Brigham Young University's (BYU) has optimized its security operations with the Genetec™ Operations Center work management system. Read Now

  • AI-based Risk Mitigation: The Next Advancement in Video Surveillance and Public Safety

    Safety is at the forefront of every organization and covers a gamut of scenarios, not just weapon-fueled lethal threats. It also includes smaller-scale and everyday situations like slipping hazards, fallen persons, unauthorized vehicles, and more. These issues cause disruptions in daily operations and cost companies and facilities money and downtime, so a fully realized security plan must involve actions that facility personnel should take once a hazard of any size occurs. Informing everyone that a hazard exists, where it’s located, and what actions to take is imperative for maintaining personal safety. Read Now

  • Fort Worth ISD Strengthens Event Safety

    The issue of concealed weapons being introduced into school extracurricular activities, including sporting events and graduations, became a growing concern in communities across the nation. According to the K-12 School Shooting Database, there were at least 202 incidents of gunfire on school grounds in 2024 across the United States, resulting in 56 deaths and 147 injuries, underscoring the urgent need for enhanced safety protocols. Read Now

Most   Popular