Advocacy Groups Sign Letter Supporting Bans of Facial Recognition on Campus

After gaining support from civil liberties groups, activists are planning a national campus day of action in March focused on campus use of facial recognition.

Over 40 advocacy and civil liberties organizations have signed on to the movement to pressure universities to ban the use of facial recognition on college campuses.

In an open letter to school administrators released Thursday, groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Consumer Federation of America, Campaign for a Commercial Free Childhood, Color of Change and the National Immigration Law Center said they supported students who are advocating for bans. The overall effort has been coordinated by Fight for the Future, a privacy rights organization.

“This type of invasive technology poses a profound threat to academic freedom,” the letter reads. “Exposing students and educators to facial recognition profoundly limits their ability to study, research, and express freely without fear of official retaliation. Students should not have to trade their right to privacy for an education.”

So far, the campaign to ban facial recognition, which kicked off last month, has earned over 50 commitments from universities that they do not plan to use the technology. Administrators at Stanford and UCLA have also backed off of proposals to use the software or abandoned opt-in systems.

The letter’s release also comes as student activists are planning a “national campus day of action” on March 2. The organizations involved -- Fight for the Future, Students for Sensible Drug Policy and the NYCLU -- are distributing a campaign document to inform student groups of what they can plan for their day of action, including delivering petitions and open letters to administrators. Some campuses will organize tabling events or other acts of protest, according to a press release.

Facial recognition is not widely used on college campuses, as the advocacy groups acknowledge, but some K-12 schools have begun to introduce it as a new measure to keep students safe.

In a statement, Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight for the Future, said that the campaign is specifically targeting universities because administrators are being courted by companies seeking to sell new security technology to campuses.

“While we ultimately believe that facial recognition should be banned across the board, we’re specifically calling out colleges and universities because they are being targeted by unscrupulous companies, aggressively marketing their tech to colleges and claiming that facial recognition can increase campus safety, streamline attendance, and even measure whether students are paying attention,” Greer said. “But the truth is there is no justifiable reason to use it.”

Overall, the groups hope to pressure Congress into passing a far-reaching ban on facial recognition technology use by government agencies as well as private institutions.

“This is one way to slow down the spread of this technology while lawmakers catch up," Greer told CNET.

About the Author

Haley Samsel is an Associate Content Editor for the Infrastructure Solutions Group at 1105 Media.

Featured

  • CISA Releases Anonymous Threat Response Guidance and Toolkit for K-12 Schools

    The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recently released the Anonymized Threat Response Guidance: A Toolkit for K-12 Schools, a new resource to help kindergarten through grade 12 (K-12) schools and their law enforcement and community partners create tailored approaches to addressing anonymous threats of violence, including those received on social media. The toolkit outlines steps school leaders can take to assess and respond to anonymous threats, better prepare for and prevent future threats, and work in coordination with law enforcement and other local partners when these threats arise. It is co-sealed with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which provided expert feedback on the toolkit’s key principles and strategies. Read Now

  • How Hospitals are Using Modern Technology to Improve Security

    Workplace violence is a serious and growing challenge for many organizations — including those in the healthcare industry. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, workers in healthcare and social services experience the highest rates of injuries caused by workplace violence and are five times as likely to suffer a workplace violence injury than workers overall — and aggressive incidents are rising. Read Now

  • Father of Georgia School Shooting Suspect Charged in Connection With Attack

    Colin Gray, the father of the 14-year-old Georgia school shooting suspect, has also been charged in connection with the attack. The 54-year-old father was charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter, two counts of second-degree murder and eight counts of cruelty to children. Read Now

  • Safeguarding Stony Brook University Hospital: HALO’S Commitment to Health & Safety

    The healthcare industry is experiencing an alarming escalation of violence, including an increase in threats against healthcare workers. As a result, it is looking for ways to be proactive and protect its staff and patients.  According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics,  the rate of injuries from violent attacks against medical professionals grew by 63% from 2011 to 2018 and hospital safety directors say that aggression against staff escalated as the COVID-19 pandemic intensified in 2020.      Read Now

Webinars